Over the years,
the term Modernism has been defined as meaning many different things. This is surprising because modernism is
a vital part of the basic literature we read/enjoy today.
Like many other significant movements, there are influential people behind the movement. I would consider Katherine Mansfield as
being the “unsung hero” that helped make modernism, specifically female
modernism, what it is today.
Modernism
is most often defined as “The combination of revolt against Victorian fathers,
recognition of the artist’s alienation, pursuit of the contemporary in
language, psychology and behavior, creation of dynamic forms in which to
contain a newly awakened sense of present reality” (Kaplan 6). Basically, it
was a new movement which introduced new views on art, social behaviors and
language. (It’s essential to know that these views contradicted the old
“Victorian” views.)
I
think it’s very important to emphasize that literature is one of the most
notable things which was influenced by modernism. As you can imagine, if modernism had failed to become what
it is today, we would still be living in the Victorian Era and have a different
way of interpreting stories.
Katherine
Mansfield has been said to have helped spark the movement of “Female
Modernism.” While Mansfield’s good
friend Virginia Woolf is mostly credited for developing the underlying
principles of this type of modernism (Kaplan), Kaplan argues that “Mansfield’s
contribution should not be underestimated. Although she was six years younger
than Woolf, Mansfield was the more innovative writer at the beginning of their
friendship” (7). Mansfield’s writing career lasted from 1911 until she
published her last work in 1922 (Nathan).
This timeframe was a period of great significance for women and their
quest for equality. In 1913, The
National Women’s Party was formed.
In 1919, the League of Women Voters was founded. And only a year later, the right to
vote was granted for women. This
was a crucial time for women’s history because they finally were able to feel
like individuals and not just the property of men. It is important to notice
that all of Mansfield’s writings were published during the times of these great
changes. This was possibly one of
the greatest times of change this country has experienced and Mansfield’s
writings were in the center of it all.
One would think that Mansfield planned this and purposely started
releasing stories at this time so she would be known for
this movement, although that theory couldn’t be more false.
It
is said that it was never Mansfield’s intent to become a “feminist theorist”
and she even wanted to separate herself from this subject. According to Sydney Kaplan, “she
(Mansfield) neither allied herself with the suffrage movement nor studied the
ideology of feminism. In fact, unlike those of Virginia Woolf, Mansfield’s
critical essays and personal letters curiously lack much discussion of women’s
role in literature” (Kaplan). Kaplan then goes on to say how it was Mansfield’s
“personal struggles, as well as her insights into the lives of women” that were
the cause of her feminist consciousness. (I found it rather amusing that
Mansfield has gotten the recognition of being part of this movement for women
(and women writers) but this was never her intent in the first place.)
Katherine
Mansfield didn’t live a very long life; she died when she was only
thirty-four. Yet her writings are
still around and she is still considered one of the best short story authors of
all time. When asked about Mansfield’s writing, famous scholar Ian Gordon said, “She had the same kind
of directive influence on the art of the short story as Joyce had on the
novel. After Joyce and Katherine
Mansfield neither the novel nor the short story can ever be quite the same
again.”
After
reading “The Fly” or “Miss Brill”, do you get a sense that Mansfield
incorporated Female Modernism into either one of these stories? If so, what affect did this have?
Works
Cited
Kaplan, Sydney Janet. Katherine Mansfield and the Origins of
Modernist Fiction. Ithica: Cornell
University Press,
1991. Print
Nathan, Rhoda B. Katherine Mansfield. New York: The
Continuum Publish Company, 1988.
Print
I have to disagree, and I do not think Mansfield's writings incorporate female modernism. Neither have any underlying feminist themes; "The Fly" is about a father's struggle to accept his son's death. "Miss Brill" is about a woman's life alone and a person's need for companionship, although the main character is a woman in "Miss Brill" I do not believe that this has a underlying feminist influence. I do agree that her stories are modern for her time, but not that they have a feminist influence.
ReplyDeleteI think that Mansfield's work is subject to personal interpretation and values. Although 'The Fly' is absent from female influence, is this absence not a comment on the emotional instability of men in the absence of a female mediator who often acts to control or lessen the heightened emotions of their counterpart or act as a figure of support? in this respect i think Mansfield is portraying the social roles that men are expected to exhibit, it would appear abstract if Mansfield had instead offered us a depiction of a man who was delving into self pity and grief like many of her female characters do. instead we are offered a man who transposes his melancholy into violent and manipulative behaviours. "Miss Brill" is offered as a women with no social significant and is shown to be rejected by the society she continually attempts to play a crucial "role" in. however mansfield has given her this deflated status as a projection of her marital status, she is a spinster and thus it can be suggested that without a male counterpart, women in society hold no social significance. this is reflected consistently through stories such as "A Dill Pickle", the unnamed protagonist in "Frau Fischer" and "The Canary"
Delete