Donald
Barthelme is one of the writers involved with a fairly new idea and new style
of writing called “New Journalism.”
This idea of New Journalism has been heavily influenced by a man named
Tom Wolfe since the 1960s-70s due to his belief that reporting needed to be
more interesting. The most
important feature of New Journalism is the fact that it stresses the distinction
between fact and fiction. Marc
Weingarten describes this form of writing as “one that announced and privileged
the journalist’s subject position, effectually blurring the lines between
disinterested observation (journalism) and subjective reporting (fiction)”
(1091). In other words, New
Journalism is a type of writing that focuses on more descriptive fact and
truth, rather than subjective and bias recording of events. In Donald Barthelme’s story “The Indian
Uprising,” he demonstrates Tom Wolfe’s ideals of New Journalism through the use
of detailed facts that draw in the readers’ attention to his experiences and
encourages them to distinguish truth from opinion.
New Journalism does not suggest that readers
are unable to distinguish the difference between fact and fiction. Instead, it is suggesting that a more
detailed version of a story creates a more powerful effect on the way that
readers find the truth in a story.
In an interview with Tom Wolfe, he states that the techniques used in
New Journalism “enable you to create the most powerful effects, the richest
types of characters and situations…” (29). He refers to the downfall of
reporters as being the fact that they can tell you every detail of what their
story is about, but when their article comes out in a
newspaper/magazine/journal, it is condensed into a couple of paragraphs that
provide no realistic detail at all, causing it to be categorized as less interesting
than what it really is. Wolfe
inspires writers to stay true to their whole story instead of taking away
details that provide realism, and only giving a summary.
Although every thought and detail seems to run
together, Donald Barthelme’s “The Indian Uprising,” gives
a sense of realism as he describes the events of the war as well as his
emotions as he experiences a battle within himself between personal and
political views. The narrator in
the story struggles with the idea of understanding and often finds it difficult
to find meaning in why things happen.
The fact that the narrator searches for the meaning behind things
reflects the way that New Journalism writers think in the sense that they are
always searching for a truth in stories.
If we all have our own interpretations, how are we ever supposed to find
a universal truth? Is everything
meant to have a universal truth, or are we supposed to form our own opinion
based on facts provided?
Reilly,
Ian. "The Gang That Wouldn't Write Straight: Wolfe, Thompson, Didion,
Capote & The New Journalism Revolution." Journal Of Popular Culture
40.6 (2007): 1091-1092. Academic Search Complete. Web. 22 Apr. 2012.
"Tom Wolfe:
The New Journalism." Literary Cavalcade 57.8 (2005): 29. Academic Search
Complete. Web. 22 Apr. 2012.
One possible way to find a universal truth is to form your own interpretation and then discuss your view with others and tweak your opinion as you hear others opinions. Almost like what we do in class! We discuss our interpretations and then combine them to form a possible truth that we all deem acceptable. I do believe in universal truths and I do believe that sometimes they can bring creativity and wonderment down a level. Universal truths almost ruin imagination and possibilities when there is only one answer to something. They can be good or bad!
ReplyDelete