Sunday, March 4, 2012

Spirituality and Symbolism in Gogol's "The Overcoat"


by Max Levine

When Nikolai Gogol wrote “The Overcoat” there was a lot going on in his life. Many think that the influence of “The Overcoat’ is largely due to a religious and spiritual event that occurred in Gogol’s life (Hippisley 121). “The Overcoat” was written by Gogol in Vienna in the summer of 1840. Before that it is thought that Gogol wrote this story just after he fell extremely ill to the point where he thought he was going to die. When he survived he took this as a sign that God wanted him to fulfill a mission. V. Zenkovskij stated that Gogol’s religious beliefs were so bound up with his concept of aesthetics which led him to conclude that Gogol’s first stay in Rome attained his highest spiritual tranquility (Hippisley 122). He believes that Gogol’s tranquility is due to the fact that he was highly involved with the Roman Catholic Church. Gogol was impressed with how calm everything was inside the churches of Rome and the feeling it gave him due to the architecture and services. Sadly his tranquility shattered one day in 1839 when a close friend of Gogol’s, Count V’el’gorskij, was falling very ill. His perfect spirituality which he had in Rome was now gone due to this traumatic experience. It is thought that since this traumatic experience happened just before this book was written that it would leave a large impact on “The Overcoat” (Hippisley 123). Anthony Hippisley states in his article, that “a spiritual crisis is the real substance of the tale and that to express it the author drew upon the symbology of clothing with which he was familiar both through the Bible and through Orthodox Liturgy” (Hippisley 123). This brings us to the symbol of the overcoat itself. Hippisley describes that there is a parallel between the actual overcoat in “The Overcoat” and the clothing that is talked about in a religious work, “Meditation on the Divine Liturgy” which is also written by Gogol (Hippisley 123). In an excerpt from this story the parallel can be seen clearly:

The priest completes his vesting by putting on the chasuble (phelonion), the upper most vestment, convering all the others and symbolizing the all-embracing justice of God, and says: ‘Let Thy priests be clothed with righteousness; and let Thy saints shoud for joy, always, now and ever, and to the ages of ages. Amen’ (Psalms 123:9). Thus invested with the divine instruments, the priest is now another man. (Gogol 13)

From this quote we can clearly see how similar this is to the character Akakij Akakievic because he exchanges his dirty old coat for a brand new coat and becomes a new man (Hippisley 123). This gives the idea that Gogol really has a connection with using clothing as symbols. Another idea about this given by Vladimir Nabokov, who says that “Akakij Akakievic’s clothing process is really a disrobing that brings him back to his original ghostlike state of nonbeing”(Hippisley 122). What this is really saying is that when Akakij is going around stealing overcoats from other people all he is doing is sneaking around where nobody can see him which in turn, is similar to how he was when he was alive, nobody really noticed him or the work that he was doing. In relation to what was just said, Cyril Bryner states that “The Overcoat” was less respected than many of Gogol’s other works mainly due to the fact that it does not relate to “his purely humorous or his purely fantastic stories.” She also states that it is less representative of Gogol’s style than “Deal Souls”, “The Nose”, and “The Inspector-General” (Bryner 499). The reason for this can be explained by the traumatic experience that happened to Gogol when he was first in Rome. It makes sense that “The Overcoat” might not be as good or even related to this other works due to this experience that may have altered the thoughts of his mind during this period in his life. With all of this said, the facts come together as to the symbols used, the direction of the story, and perhaps even the quality of the story which Gogol produced during this time in his life. As a reader, do you care if a work is based on a particular event in real life or would you rather have a story be entirely made up?




Works Cited

Bryner, Cyril. "Gogolľs "The Overcoat" in World Literature." The Slavonic and East European             Review 32.79 (1954): 499-509. JSTOR. Web. 16 Feb. 2012.             <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4204570>.

Gogol, Nicolas. "The Overcoat." The Story and Its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. Ed.             Ann Charters. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2011. 474-96. Print.
           
Hippisley, Anthony. "Gogol"s "The Overcoat": A Further Interpretation." The Slavic and East             European Journal 20.2 (1976): 121-29. JSTOR. Web. 16 Feb. 2012.             <http://www.jstor.org/stable/305820>.

7 comments:

  1. As a reader I enjoy reading both fictional and non fictional stories. When a story really catches my attention and makes me want the main character to accomplish their goal or make a statement it’s often more interesting in my opinion if it’s based off a true story. I also enjoy stories that are made up because if every story was based off a true story we would lose many of the outlandish and exaggerated tales that are in existence today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I read stories I do not prefer them to be real or made up. I have noticed that fictional stories tend to be more fun to read and some of their ideas are off the wall, although, nonfiction stories can also consist of these characteristics. The thing I find to be prevalent in nonfiction stories is the amount of passion portrayed through the author’s words and tone. Because it was a real life experience to whomever may be writing, I feel more of a genuine feeling is brought out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree. Stories can be amazing whether they are fiction or nonfiction, and either one of these genres have become famous and have their own positive and negative aspects. Fictional stories are more up to the imagination and the author does seem to be a third-party observer without much emotion. they seem to leave it up to the reader to come up with their own perceptions of the characters. However, non-fictional stories give you a more authentic feeling and make you fell as though you are more connected with the characters.

      Delete
  3. I would rather "The Overcoat" be a fictional story rather than one based off non-fiction. People are cruel, and in "The Overcoat" this is especially true in how the main character eventually meets his end. To know, or to even think about a person being essentially scared to death by someone who thinks they important is a depressing thought. It means that anyone, including myself, could be treated in such a manner. By knowing this story is just a story it is easier to separate from the main character and just think of what happened as an event that will never happen in the real world. What is interesting though is that Gogol blurs the lines in "The Overcoat", making the fictional as true as the non-fictional. Despite knowing that "The Overcoat" may be just a story, it is easy to believe that society could kill a man out of cruelty

    ReplyDelete
  4. when your writing a non-fictional story your limited to what you can say, but when your writing a fictional story there are no limits. the writer can go wild and write anything. because anything is possible. If a story can grab my attention and keep my attention, that it does not matter to me whether it is a fiction or nonfiction story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't think it would have made any difference to me if this story was real or fake. I think the message it resonates is good enough. That being said, this story is not fictional. When I say that, I mean that everything that occurred int he story really could happen to any one of us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whether or not the story is based on real life or not, that takes away from a moral or point of view that the author is trying to convey in the first place. If "The Overcoat" was based on the Gogol's real life religious experiences and that topic was widely known, what about all of the other meanings this story has? An oppressive government and class issues are just some of the common interpretations. there are many different sides to a story. Whether of not it is based of of a true experience or only an idea and feeling doesn't matter. Facts and symbols come together in many different ways when interpreting literary works,it is all left to the perspective and ideals of the reader.

    ReplyDelete