Thursday, April 12, 2012

"The Lottery": A View on Death or the Need for Tradition in Society?

by Casey Watson

Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” has caused a huge discussion among the public. Most people hated it simply because they didn’t understand the meaning behind it or it was too brutal for them. Some intellects looked deep into the story to define some type of meaning to the story. Gayle Whittier, a professor at Birmingham University, thought that it was a misogynist parable, or a story focused on the hatred of woman with a moral or spiritual lesson attached to it. He states that the lottery and society favors man as the leaders in the village. In the lottery, two males conduct it and even the males that are head of the household chose the ballot from the black box. Women aren’t given any choices until they are already in danger of the lottery. Women in the village are said to be weaker than the men in the village and they are only commentators because they say more than they do during the lottery: “In any case, the male alphabet continues over the women’s voices, defining the ritual despite them, for, in ‘The Lottery,’ untoward and vocal females like Tessie Hutchinson will be ‘shut up’” (Whittier 355).
Tessie Hutchinson isn’t like most women in the village and she speaks out when she is chosen for the lottery. Doing this causes the village to look at her in a different light because she is challenging the silence of women, as well as showing that she is unwilling to be sacrificed for her family and village. One other point made is that the black mark on Tessie’s piece of paper was made by a man. At this time, only a husband could open his wife’s body by violence. The slip of paper with the black mark represents the dominance that men have over women. Tessie represents everything that a woman should not be. Tessie is “now stereotyped as the uncooperative, dissident, overly vocal, unmotherly ‘bad sport…’ What will be stoned to death at the end of the account is a traditional image of the ‘bad woman’” (Whittier 360).
            Amy Griffin from Schreiner College interpreted “The Lottery” in a much different way. She focused on society’s need for rituals and the tendency of violence. Griffin compares the process of growing crops to the life cycle. She stated that ancient peoples did sacrificial rituals to imitate what happens during a resurrection: “Seeds buried… represent death. But with the life forces of water and the sun, the seed grows, representing rebirth” (Griffin 44). Griffin believes that man has a need for rituals such as this. Another way this is represented in the story is in the relationship between the two conductors of the lottery, Mr. Graves and Mr. Summers, and the life cycle. Mr. Summers is said to set the stage for the whole lottery because of his name and how nice he is. Mr. Graves is said to represent the darkness of the lottery because of his name and quietness. This shows that “Life brings death, and death recycles life” (45). The ritual wasn’t taken serious by the village and some things changed since the very first lottery. The villagers don’t understand the true meaning of the lottery and only continue to do it because it is a tradition and they want to feel like they are a part of that. Even though things have changed in the lottery, they still kept the gruesome act of stoning at the end, which shows society’s need for violence.
            These two interpretations shows that “The Lottery” can have many different meanings, it just depends on the way you look into it. Since this story has been judged so harshly by its readers, I think it’s good that these critics have shown that you can interpret it any way you please as long as you can justify your reasoning. After reading about how Whittier and Griffin interpreted “The Lottery,” in which ways would you agree and disagree with their views?

Works Cited
Whittier, Gayle. "'The Lottery' As Misogynist Parable." Women's Studies 18.4 (1991): 353.
Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Apr. 2012.

Griffin, Amy A. "Jackson's The Lottery." Explicator 58.1 (1999): 44. Academic Search Complete.
Web. 9 Apr. 2012.

12 comments:

  1. After reading the lottery I did not even think of a feministic point of view and analysis, so thank you for opening up my eyes first of all! I agree with Whittier in that the town is male dominant and that the women in the town were portrayed as compliant and quiet. However, I do not see the connection between the dark black lines on the paper as male dominance. I took the black mark more as the devils mark or a demons mark. I agree with Amy griffin’s connection between Mr. Graves name and the symbol of death and quietness. I also agree with her statement that the town does this horrific act because they want to keep violence alive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought the feminist point of view was very interesting. While reading "The Lottery" I only saw the violent aspect of the story. Between the two point of views I am not exactly sure which was Jackson's goal in writing the story. Maybe she did not have a goal but just came up with this idea out of thin air and thought it would make an interesting story.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed reading this interpretation of The Lottery. I definitely noticed somewhat of a male dominance in the story but did not think too much about it. I cannot remember when this story was written but i wonder if the time period has anything to do with the author's viewpoint, in the ways she was raised and the society she grew up in?

    ReplyDelete
  4. While reading this story I definitely saw it in the view of Amy Griffin rather than Tessie Hutchinson. The feminist approach is an interesting way to look at this story but if I do recall correctly, wasn't there an equal chance for both a man and a woman to be chosen? If so then this does not really fit the meaning of the story. I feel that men being in the leadership position in this story relates more to that of tradition than anything else.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not believe in the feminist point of view at all. It is just a coincidence I think that the men do everything. Jackson even said that she really was not thinking when she wrote this story, it just came to her and she wrote it with no point or idea. I do not concour to what Whittier said. Though there may be male dominance in this village it does not mean they are against the woman. The Lottery was all luck or lack of luck. Even in our society now I still feel like there is male dominance but this is a subject for debate some where else.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think your post was awesome. It was good that you brought attention to the various interpretations of the story because I know after reading the story I was just kind of grossed out. I agree with both of their points of view. I can see why Whittier would think that that story was showing that men had more control over woman but i think that the story was representing more of Griffins point about tradition.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When i read the story i never thought of it in the way that Whittier put it because every person had an equal chance of being drawn. I also found it interesting that Griffin defended rituals and violence. The way that I saw the story was as a precautionary tale against the mentality of going with the flow without asking questions. But it was great to get a couple different points of view on the story.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do not necessarily believe in the feminist point of view, however after reading this blog I have become more aware of the little things that reflect the superiority of men. Feminism seeks to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment, yet this story has yet to prove that. Yes; women are thought to have the role in the family of doing the "dirty work", and yet the appreciation is still lacking. Tessie very much serves as the voice of most women's silence in this story. I have agreements with both critics in this case. But my most intriguing observation might be that do neither men OR women even understand the true meaning behind "The Lottery"? I tend to believe that the violence of the act is the most important thing to the village.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think I agree with both Griffin and Whittler. I did not notice the feminist approach that Whittler talks about while reading the story for myself; however, I think that the points Whittler for it are totally valid looking back on the story. I did, however, notice the need for the ritual and that the town did not take it seriously enough (considering what it was) as Griffin points out in her account of "The Lottery".

    ReplyDelete