Sunday, April 8, 2012

The Language of a Culture

by Maggie Thomas
            Zora Neale Hurston, like many other African American writers of this time (1900s-1930s), was involved in the Harlem Renaissance. Through this movement and through her work of short stories and novels she gained notoriety with “writing that was uniquely ethnocentric and at the same time appealing to both mainstream and minority audiences”(Heard 129). Hurston was known for writing and depicting her characters in the dialect and spelling that was common in their own communities. As an anthropologist she traveled the south, around the US in general and even abroad to Haiti to study different cultures and mainly the African American culture to depict in her writing. Hurston truly embraced her southern heritage and the mind-set shone through her writing.
            Today, Hurston is given the recognition as one of the greatest African American writers of her time. But, there are always the critics and the ones who disagree. There were critics that were openly disagreeing and disapproving of Hurston’s writing. Richard Wright who was an African American author most known for his work “Uncle Tom’s Children.” He openly disliked Hurston’s work stating that she “voluntarily continues in her novel the tradition which was forced upon the Negro in the theater, that is, the minstrel technique that makes the 'white folks' laugh” (Carpio). This criticism comes from Hurston’s realistic depiction of Negro talk and her common setting in her stories as the South. Hurston’s defense was to criticize Wright’s own work and state “since the author himself is a Negro his dialect is a puzzling thing. One wonders how he arrived at it. Certainly he does not write by ear unless he is tone deaf” (Carpio). Hurston accurately tried to capture the dialect of African Americans in the South and in the country. Even though she was a part of the Harlem Renaissance which took place in New York City, North, she was never influenced by the Northern Disposition as Wright was. Wright openly criticized the Jim Crow laws and advocated for black civil rights, but all from New York City where he resided, he drew an obvious barrier between himself and the South. Hurston stayed true to her southern roots for she “preferred Southern rural settings” (Carpio).
            Hurston was a major player in the Harlem Renaissance and it allowed her to gain literary standing and truly started her career as an influential writer, but she does not see the North as a proper place for the true character of the Negro to be depicted. As an anthropologist “she analyzes how identity markers like dialect and skin color adversely limit the admission of non-mainstream social groups into the mainstream society” (Heard 130). She uses her depiction of language and marginalized non-mainstream southern rural blacks as main characters in her stories. But, gives her main characters personality that is to be admired in any race, which is what her writing is really about. Transcending social barriers of race. Was Hurston right to use the common dialect of Southern rural blacks? Or as Wright thinks, does it give her less credibility?

                                                            Works Cited
Carpio, Glenda R. and Werner Solloros. "The Newly Complicated Zora Neale Hurston."             Chronicle Of Higher Education 57.18 (2011): B6-B9. Academic Search Complete. Web.             30 Mar. 2012.


Heard, Matthew. "Dancing Is Dancing No Matter Who Is Doing It": Zora Neale Hurston,             Literacy, And Contemporary Writing Pedagogy." College Literature 34.1 (2007): 129-            155. Academic Search Complete. Web. 30 Mar. 2012.

5 comments:

  1. I think that Hurston's use of southern dialect in her writings serves to portray a more realistic picture of the daily life of African-Americans during that time. It allows the reader to be more immersed in the narrative, all the while, serving as a historical record of the culture. I disagree with Wright's argument that it marginalizes African-Americans and Hurston's writing because it is a realistic description of life in the South as an African-American. Wright was not familiar with the southern condition and therefore misinterpreted Hurston’s use of dialect in her work as a perpetuation of stereotypes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do agree with the fact that Hurston's use of the dialect reflects the way that people were talking back then but I do have a couple problems with it. The first problem that I have with it is that it makes the characters in the story seem less educated than they could possibly be. Maybe this is what she is trying to do with the language. If this is the case then great, but if it is not it poses a problem. The other issue that I have with this is that it is hard to read. It does not flow well with the rest of the story. I understand that the characters in the story talk that way but why doesn't the narrator? This is probably the most prevalent problem I have with the way she includes the dialect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The language that Hurston uses in her stories helps to reflect the time period in which they take place which helps the reader to better understand the context. I think it's interesting that she decides to continue to write using this dialect even though she is part of the Harlem Renaissance. Yet, this action somewhat defends African American literature and character in what is not "a proper place for the true character of the Negro to be depicted." It could be a way to spread their southern culture as well as educate people in the north.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The use of the "southern slang" Hurston uses in her story accurately portrays the southern lifestyle. However, i do believe that such language is depicted in a stereotypical way. As much as we like to assume that this is the way southerners talk, it makes it seem that those people are poorly educated and have not achieved a higher education. I would not go as far to agree so in this but i do believe that Hurston used this language for a specific reason. I think she was accurately portraying the southern hospitality stereotype but which can also create false accusations about the characters used with it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I found it interesting that Hurston was criticized by another African American author because of her realistic portrayal of the language of the time. I would have assumed that he would have related to her so called “slang” being of the same race. Obviously this is an incorrect assumption on my behalf, and rather the place and time of culture has a greater influence rather than just race. The author who rejected her writing techniques was from the North where she is from the South. She uses what she knows and what is familiar to write her stories and I think this is the most realistic way she could have chosen to do so. I do not agree that the “slang” makes the characters seem unintelligent, but rather adaptive. We do not speak proper English today but does that make us any less intelligent than our forefathers?

    ReplyDelete